破产重整论文：破产重整制度的研究
【中文摘要】本文研究的对象是一个在我国破产法律中刚刚出现不久的新概念--破产重整制度,由于该制度引进我国法律才短短的几年时间,所以学界关于该制度的研究还不是很多。本文主要是通过对我国破产法中关于破产重整制度的各项法条的研究分析,并参考美国、英国、法国、日本、韩国以及我国台湾地区等国家和地区关于破产重整制度的规定和司法实践,与我国的重整制度进行比较论述。正文第一章,首先讨论破产重整制度的概念、特征和功能,我国破产法中没有直接给出重整的概念,但学界一直存在关于重整这一概念的争论,争论的主要焦点在于重整的究竟是单一的还是多样的。第二将破产重整概念与破产清算概念、破产和解概念进行对比,分析总结破产重整制度的特点。第三讨论重整制度的功能,即解决企业的债权债务关系、帮助企业走出困境实现企业再建和保障社会公共利益。正文第二章,深入分析我国破产重整的主要内容,包括重整程序的启动,重整制度的核心内容--重整计划的制定,债权人会议对重整计划的表决通过,以及法院的强制批准权。重整计划的启动中包括申请主体、重整原因和重整能力的分析。重整计划的讨论中包括重整计划的制定、重整计划的内容和提交时间。债权人会议的表决通过是保障重整计划继续进行的关键步骤,本文中讨论了债权人会议的组成及表决方式,最后讨论法院的对重整计划的强制批准权。正文第三章讨论的是我国破产重整制度的主要弊端,包括破产重整的立案标准不够清晰；破产重整适
用主体过于宽泛；股东没有机会参与破产重整计划的表决；法院批准破产重整计划的自由裁量权过大,没有进行必要的限制。正文第四章是笔者对我国破产重整制度的建议。包括将“有挽救可能”作为破产重整的必备要件；限制可适用破产重整的主体范围,规定资产在一定额度之下的有限责任公司不能适用破产重整制度；规定破产清算申请受理后债权人同样有权利提出对债务人进行破产重整的申请；在债务人或管理人未按期提出重整计划草案或者重整计划草案未通过或未被批准的情况下,不应当然的宣告债务人破产,应当根据企业的实际情况给与企业不同的处理结果。
【英文摘要】In this thesis,the focus is a new concept in the Law of the People’s Republic of China on Enterprise Bankruptcy—Reorganization System. the system was
incorporated in the Chinese law just a few years ago,so there are not many academic researches on the System of
Reorganization. In this thesis, by research and analysis the articles in the Law of the People’s Republic of China on Enterprise Bankruptcy,reference to the provisions and judicial practice in U.S..Britain. France. Japan. South Korea.Taiwan province and other countries and regions.,to discusse the reorganization system in China.In the first
section.First,discuss the concept.features and functions on Reorganization System will be presented.the law in China does
not have the direct concept of Reorganization, but there has been academic debate on the concept of Reorganization System, the main focus on the debate is the purpose of the system is single or multiple. Second,compare reorganization with
Bankruptcy Liquidation and Compromise, analyze and summarize the characteristics of Reorganization. Third,discuss the
functional transformation of Reorganization System-- resolve the debts among enterprises.help the enterprise out of
difficulty and evolution of rescue-oriented mechanisms and protect the public interest.In the second section. discuss the content of Reorganization System deeply,including the apply of Reorganization, the core of Reorganization System—the
formulation of the bankruptcy Reorganization organs, the vote and pass of Reorganization organs and the Court’s right of approval. The start of the Reorganization includes the
application, the causes of Reorganization and the capabilities of Reorganization. The discussion of the Reorganization organs, including the formulation of the organs, the content and the filing deadline of Reorganization organs. The important step to protect Reorganization System is the vote and pass of
Reorganization organs.The form and the mode of The creditors’ Meeting is discussed in this section.Last,discuss the Court’
s compulsive right of approval.The major abuse of
Reorganization system in China is discussed in the third
section, including the standard of filing reorganization is unclearly;the main body of Reorganization System is too large;the shareholders don’t have the right to vote the reorganization organs and it is not useful limition of the court’s right to approve.The fourth section is the author’s recommendations of Reorganization System. Including “have the possible to save “ is the essential elements of
reorganization and restructuring;limit the main body have right to apply reorganization, a certain amount of assets under the provisions of the limited liability company can not be applied Reorganization; Creditors also have the right to
propose reorganization of the debtor’s bankruptcy application when the application for bankruptcy liquidation is accepted by the court;the debtor or the administrator fails to draft or re-reorganization plan proposed by the Reorganization organs is not approved by the case, should not be declaring the
enterprise bankrupt, should treat the enterprises different results according to the actual situation of the enterprise.
【关键词】破产重整 计划草案 有挽救可能性
【英文关键词】Reorganization Reorganization organs
have the possibility to save
【目录】破产重整制度的研究
3-5ABSTRACT5-6摘要一、破产重整制度
1、破产
(二) 引言9-11概述11-15(一) 破产重整的概念和特征11-142、破产重整制度的特征11-14重整制度的概念11
破产重整制度的功能14-15
14
14-15
15-261、解决企业债权债务关系3、保障社会公共利益2、帮助企业走出困境14二、我国破产重整制度的主要内容及分析(一) 破产重整程序的启动15-19
2、重整原因及其分析17-18
(二) 破产重整计划19-231、申请主体及3、适用对象1、重整计划其分析16-17及其分析18-19
的制定权及其分析19-20
20-222、重整计划的内容及其分析(三) 3、提交破产重整计划的期限及其分析22-23
破产重整计划的通过及批准23-26
及其分析23-24
24-26
26-291、关系人会议的表决通过2、法院对破产重整计划的批准及其分析三、我国破产重整制度存在的主要弊端(一) 破产重整的立案标准不够清晰26(二) 破产重整适用主体过于宽泛26-27
重整计划的表决27
大27-29
29-32
29(三) 股东没有机会参与破产(四) 法院批准重整计划的自由裁量权过四、我国破产重整法律制度的完善意见(一) 将”有挽救可能”作为破产重整的必要要件(二) 限制可适用破产重整的主体范围29-30(三)
扩大破产申请受理后有权要求重整的主体范围30期提出重整计划草案不当然导致破产清算30-31
划草案未通过或未被批准不当然导致破产清算31-32
32-33致谢33-34参考文献34-35
(四) 未按(五) 重整计五、结语
破产重整论文：破产重整制度的研究
【中文摘要】本文研究的对象是一个在我国破产法律中刚刚出现不久的新概念--破产重整制度,由于该制度引进我国法律才短短的几年时间,所以学界关于该制度的研究还不是很多。本文主要是通过对我国破产法中关于破产重整制度的各项法条的研究分析,并参考美国、英国、法国、日本、韩国以及我国台湾地区等国家和地区关于破产重整制度的规定和司法实践,与我国的重整制度进行比较论述。正文第一章,首先讨论破产重整制度的概念、特征和功能,我国破产法中没有直接给出重整的概念,但学界一直存在关于重整这一概念的争论,争论的主要焦点在于重整的究竟是单一的还是多样的。第二将破产重整概念与破产清算概念、破产和解概念进行对比,分析总结破产重整制度的特点。第三讨论重整制度的功能,即解决企业的债权债务关系、帮助企业走出困境实现企业再建和保障社会公共利益。正文第二章,深入分析我国破产重整的主要内容,包括重整程序的启动,重整制度的核心内容--重整计划的制定,债权人会议对重整计划的表决通过,以及法院的强制批准权。重整计划的启动中包括申请主体、重整原因和重整能力的分析。重整计划的讨论中包括重整计划的制定、重整计划的内容和提交时间。债权人会议的表决通过是保障重整计划继续进行的关键步骤,本文中讨论了债权人会议的组成及表决方式,最后讨论法院的对重整计划的强制批准权。正文第三章讨论的是我国破产重整制度的主要弊端,包括破产重整的立案标准不够清晰；破产重整适
用主体过于宽泛；股东没有机会参与破产重整计划的表决；法院批准破产重整计划的自由裁量权过大,没有进行必要的限制。正文第四章是笔者对我国破产重整制度的建议。包括将“有挽救可能”作为破产重整的必备要件；限制可适用破产重整的主体范围,规定资产在一定额度之下的有限责任公司不能适用破产重整制度；规定破产清算申请受理后债权人同样有权利提出对债务人进行破产重整的申请；在债务人或管理人未按期提出重整计划草案或者重整计划草案未通过或未被批准的情况下,不应当然的宣告债务人破产,应当根据企业的实际情况给与企业不同的处理结果。
【英文摘要】In this thesis,the focus is a new concept in the Law of the People’s Republic of China on Enterprise Bankruptcy—Reorganization System. the system was
incorporated in the Chinese law just a few years ago,so there are not many academic researches on the System of
Reorganization. In this thesis, by research and analysis the articles in the Law of the People’s Republic of China on Enterprise Bankruptcy,reference to the provisions and judicial practice in U.S..Britain. France. Japan. South Korea.Taiwan province and other countries and regions.,to discusse the reorganization system in China.In the first
section.First,discuss the concept.features and functions on Reorganization System will be presented.the law in China does
not have the direct concept of Reorganization, but there has been academic debate on the concept of Reorganization System, the main focus on the debate is the purpose of the system is single or multiple. Second,compare reorganization with
Bankruptcy Liquidation and Compromise, analyze and summarize the characteristics of Reorganization. Third,discuss the
functional transformation of Reorganization System-- resolve the debts among enterprises.help the enterprise out of
difficulty and evolution of rescue-oriented mechanisms and protect the public interest.In the second section. discuss the content of Reorganization System deeply,including the apply of Reorganization, the core of Reorganization System—the
formulation of the bankruptcy Reorganization organs, the vote and pass of Reorganization organs and the Court’s right of approval. The start of the Reorganization includes the
application, the causes of Reorganization and the capabilities of Reorganization. The discussion of the Reorganization organs, including the formulation of the organs, the content and the filing deadline of Reorganization organs. The important step to protect Reorganization System is the vote and pass of
Reorganization organs.The form and the mode of The creditors’ Meeting is discussed in this section.Last,discuss the Court’
s compulsive right of approval.The major abuse of
Reorganization system in China is discussed in the third
section, including the standard of filing reorganization is unclearly;the main body of Reorganization System is too large;the shareholders don’t have the right to vote the reorganization organs and it is not useful limition of the court’s right to approve.The fourth section is the author’s recommendations of Reorganization System. Including “have the possible to save “ is the essential elements of
reorganization and restructuring;limit the main body have right to apply reorganization, a certain amount of assets under the provisions of the limited liability company can not be applied Reorganization; Creditors also have the right to
propose reorganization of the debtor’s bankruptcy application when the application for bankruptcy liquidation is accepted by the court;the debtor or the administrator fails to draft or re-reorganization plan proposed by the Reorganization organs is not approved by the case, should not be declaring the
enterprise bankrupt, should treat the enterprises different results according to the actual situation of the enterprise.
【关键词】破产重整 计划草案 有挽救可能性
【英文关键词】Reorganization Reorganization organs
have the possibility to save
【目录】破产重整制度的研究
3-5ABSTRACT5-6摘要一、破产重整制度
1、破产
(二) 引言9-11概述11-15(一) 破产重整的概念和特征11-142、破产重整制度的特征11-14重整制度的概念11
破产重整制度的功能14-15
14
14-15
15-261、解决企业债权债务关系3、保障社会公共利益2、帮助企业走出困境14二、我国破产重整制度的主要内容及分析(一) 破产重整程序的启动15-19
2、重整原因及其分析17-18
(二) 破产重整计划19-231、申请主体及3、适用对象1、重整计划其分析16-17及其分析18-19
的制定权及其分析19-20
20-222、重整计划的内容及其分析(三) 3、提交破产重整计划的期限及其分析22-23
破产重整计划的通过及批准23-26
及其分析23-24
24-26
26-291、关系人会议的表决通过2、法院对破产重整计划的批准及其分析三、我国破产重整制度存在的主要弊端(一) 破产重整的立案标准不够清晰26(二) 破产重整适用主体过于宽泛26-27
重整计划的表决27
大27-29
29-32
29(三) 股东没有机会参与破产(四) 法院批准重整计划的自由裁量权过四、我国破产重整法律制度的完善意见(一) 将”有挽救可能”作为破产重整的必要要件(二) 限制可适用破产重整的主体范围29-30(三)
扩大破产申请受理后有权要求重整的主体范围30期提出重整计划草案不当然导致破产清算30-31
划草案未通过或未被批准不当然导致破产清算31-32
32-33致谢33-34参考文献34-35
(四) 未按(五) 重整计五、结语