ASIL等级及例子

ASIL Determination Exercise

ISO 26262

ASIL Determination Exercise

1

The Exercise

• The six hazards to be classified are the following: 1. Unwanted deployment of airbag 2. Airbag function unavailable, without any information to the driver about this unavailability 3. Unwanted full braking (around 10 ms-2), not limited in time 4. Unwanted full braking (around 10 ms-2), 1 second duration 5. “Collision avoidance by braking” function unavailable, without any information to the driver about this unavailability 6. Total loss of service brake function, i.e. not possible for the driver to brake using the brake pedal.

ISO 26262

ASIL Determination Exercise

2

ASIL Factors

ISO 26262

ASIL Determination Exercise

3

ASIL Allocation

C1 E1 QM QM QM QM QM QM QM A QM QM A B

ASIL Determination Exercise

C2 QM QM QM A QM QM A B QM A B C

C3 QM QM A B QM A B C A B C D

4

S1

E2 E3 E4 E1 E2 E3 E4 E1 E2 E3 E4

S2

S3

ISO 26262

Results and Discussion

ISO 26262

ASIL Determination Exercise

5

Version 1

Hazard S - Severity

S3 1. Unwanted deployment of airbag Driver distraction and possible incapacitation meaning the worst case is an accident leading to lifethreatening injuries

E - Exposure

E4 The driver is exposed to this potential hazard during the majority of all driving situations as the airbag is continually ready for action (recall E is the probability of exposure to driving situation where an accident can potentially happen)

C - Controllability

C3 The driver may be distracted and/or disorientated by the airbag firing and may react instinctively e.g. jerk the steering wheel. In this scenario, even such a small deviation may require skilled and rapid intervention to correct. Estimate 50% of drivers could have an initial panic reaction. Furthermore high likelihood of driver being disorientated or even rendered unconscious. Although C2 may have seemed more appropriate initially given how drivers would react (if conscious) the potential for incapacity leads to a classification of C3.

ASIL

D

ISO 26262

ASIL Determination Exercise

6

Version 2

Hazard S - Severity

S3 1. Unwanted The driver may deployment be so distracted of airbag that a lifethreatening accident occurs

E - Exposure C - Controllability

E4 Situations where life-threatening accidents may occur represent over 10% of the driving time C2 1%-10% of drivers are assumed to be incapable of avoiding a life-threatening accident

ASIL

C No need to Investigate S2 and S1 effects as ASIL will not be above C anyway

ISO 26262

ASIL Determination Exercise

7

Version 1

Hazard S - Severity

S3 2. Airbag function permanently unavailable, without any information to the driver about this unavailability We consider the situations where the airbag should have deployed which by definition are scenarios leading to an S3 outcome

E - Exposure

E1 Accidents are very rare events, occurring less than once per year per vehicle

C - Controllability

C3 No driver action is possible to control the outcome of this hazard.

ASIL

A

ISO 26262

ASIL Determination Exercise

8

Version 2

Hazard

2. Airbag function permanently unavailable, without any information to the driver about this unavailability

S - Severity

S3 The lack of airbag function could lead to life-threatening effects

E - Exposure

E1 Collisions are very rare events, occurring less than once per year per vehicle

C - Controllability ASIL

C3 Once the collision occurs, the driver can not control the situation A No need to Investigate S1-S2 effects as ASIL is limited to A by the E1 parameter

ISO 26262

ASIL Determination Exercise

9

Version 1

Hazard S - Severity

S3 3. Unwanted full braking (around 10ms2), not limited in time

E - Exposure

E4

C - Controllability

C3 The expected task of the driver of this vehicle is to maintain steering control of the vehicle as it slows (presumably to a halt). Other traffic participants will be expected to recognize and react to the sudden braking and stopping of this vehicle.

ASIL

D

Driving at high Very common driving scenario speed on a motorway with heavy traffic

ISO 26262

ASIL Determination Exercise

10

ASIL Determination Exercise

ISO 26262

ASIL Determination Exercise

1

The Exercise

• The six hazards to be classified are the following: 1. Unwanted deployment of airbag 2. Airbag function unavailable, without any information to the driver about this unavailability 3. Unwanted full braking (around 10 ms-2), not limited in time 4. Unwanted full braking (around 10 ms-2), 1 second duration 5. “Collision avoidance by braking” function unavailable, without any information to the driver about this unavailability 6. Total loss of service brake function, i.e. not possible for the driver to brake using the brake pedal.

ISO 26262

ASIL Determination Exercise

2

ASIL Factors

ISO 26262

ASIL Determination Exercise

3

ASIL Allocation

C1 E1 QM QM QM QM QM QM QM A QM QM A B

ASIL Determination Exercise

C2 QM QM QM A QM QM A B QM A B C

C3 QM QM A B QM A B C A B C D

4

S1

E2 E3 E4 E1 E2 E3 E4 E1 E2 E3 E4

S2

S3

ISO 26262

Results and Discussion

ISO 26262

ASIL Determination Exercise

5

Version 1

Hazard S - Severity

S3 1. Unwanted deployment of airbag Driver distraction and possible incapacitation meaning the worst case is an accident leading to lifethreatening injuries

E - Exposure

E4 The driver is exposed to this potential hazard during the majority of all driving situations as the airbag is continually ready for action (recall E is the probability of exposure to driving situation where an accident can potentially happen)

C - Controllability

C3 The driver may be distracted and/or disorientated by the airbag firing and may react instinctively e.g. jerk the steering wheel. In this scenario, even such a small deviation may require skilled and rapid intervention to correct. Estimate 50% of drivers could have an initial panic reaction. Furthermore high likelihood of driver being disorientated or even rendered unconscious. Although C2 may have seemed more appropriate initially given how drivers would react (if conscious) the potential for incapacity leads to a classification of C3.

ASIL

D

ISO 26262

ASIL Determination Exercise

6

Version 2

Hazard S - Severity

S3 1. Unwanted The driver may deployment be so distracted of airbag that a lifethreatening accident occurs

E - Exposure C - Controllability

E4 Situations where life-threatening accidents may occur represent over 10% of the driving time C2 1%-10% of drivers are assumed to be incapable of avoiding a life-threatening accident

ASIL

C No need to Investigate S2 and S1 effects as ASIL will not be above C anyway

ISO 26262

ASIL Determination Exercise

7

Version 1

Hazard S - Severity

S3 2. Airbag function permanently unavailable, without any information to the driver about this unavailability We consider the situations where the airbag should have deployed which by definition are scenarios leading to an S3 outcome

E - Exposure

E1 Accidents are very rare events, occurring less than once per year per vehicle

C - Controllability

C3 No driver action is possible to control the outcome of this hazard.

ASIL

A

ISO 26262

ASIL Determination Exercise

8

Version 2

Hazard

2. Airbag function permanently unavailable, without any information to the driver about this unavailability

S - Severity

S3 The lack of airbag function could lead to life-threatening effects

E - Exposure

E1 Collisions are very rare events, occurring less than once per year per vehicle

C - Controllability ASIL

C3 Once the collision occurs, the driver can not control the situation A No need to Investigate S1-S2 effects as ASIL is limited to A by the E1 parameter

ISO 26262

ASIL Determination Exercise

9

Version 1

Hazard S - Severity

S3 3. Unwanted full braking (around 10ms2), not limited in time

E - Exposure

E4

C - Controllability

C3 The expected task of the driver of this vehicle is to maintain steering control of the vehicle as it slows (presumably to a halt). Other traffic participants will be expected to recognize and react to the sudden braking and stopping of this vehicle.

ASIL

D

Driving at high Very common driving scenario speed on a motorway with heavy traffic

ISO 26262

ASIL Determination Exercise

10


相关文章

  • 丹参提取工艺的实验研究
  • 丹参提取工艺的实验研究 郭增军1, 苏纪兰1, 王 开2, 尤晓娟1(11西安交通大学药学院, 陕西西安710061; 21陕西省制药厂, 陕西临潼710603) 摘要:目的 考察不同提取条件下丹参中丹参酮 A .原儿茶醛的溶出情况.方法 ...查看


  • 品牌态度测量例子 - 副本
  • Chp 品牌态度测量 一.类别量表法 类别量表法,即依据受调查者可能做出的回答按其性质把问题答案分成几个类别,然后又受调查者做出选择. 形式一: 例1.您喜欢"芦荟"香波吗? ① 喜欢 ② 不喜欢 ③ 无所谓 形式二: ...查看


  • 九大危险品分类等级及其标识
  • 第1类:炸药 危险标签 名称/分类 货物 IMP 代码 /描述 / 评论或例子 爆炸品类别 1.1 REX 具有整体爆炸危险的物质和物品 这些炸药通常被禁止使用空运 (例如∶TNT .炸药或鱼雷等.) 爆炸品类别 1.2 REX 具有整体爆 ...查看


  • 电动汽车动力总成控制方法研究
  • 电动汽车动力总成控制方法研究 长期以来,诸如永磁同步电机(PMSM)和感应电机等三相交流电机,被广泛地应用于工业控制系统.在汽车应用领域,这些电机还是相对时新的装置,目前正被逐渐用作传统内燃机的补充品或替代品.PMSM采用的绕组为三相正弦分 ...查看


  • 高考英语作文偷分技巧
  • 高考英语作文偷分技巧... 看到很多朋友反复的问我高考作文的技巧,实在不忍心再拖了,翻出了去年高考前弄得英语作文技巧,整理出来与大家一起分享,不用担心没基础,我那时的基础也同样不好,但高考的作文有极强的技巧性,我总结了不少骗住批卷老师的技巧 ...查看


  • 文件和文件夹的知识
  • 如何讲授文件.文件夹.路径的概念及关系 徐州一中丁雷 [摘要] 计算机教学中有些教学内容是比较抽象晦涩的,对刚刚接触计算机的初学者来说不太容易理解和接受.文件.文件夹.路径的概念及关系,就是这样的内容,本文总结了如何更好的讲授文件.文件夹. ...查看


  • 定性指标的分级描述方法
  • 定性指标的分级描述方法 在绩效考核量表的设计过程中,针对特定的考核指标进行定性的考核是常见的考核方法之一.那么如何界定和运用定性指标才能达到最优的绩效考核效果呢?我主张对定性指标的考核运用分级描述的方法. 一般情况下,对任何指标的考核,都是 ...查看


  • 稳定初二下,展望初三上
  • 总体较期末稍有退步.第一名总分775.5,年级排名第11.前一百3人,前两百8人,700分以上24人.一千名以后19人.中层生们还是占大部分,他们将是班级班风.学风的中坚,也是自己命运的主人,我们要在这最关键的时候拉他们一把. 进步较大科目 ...查看


  • 提高英语作文的小技巧
  • 提高英语作文的小技巧 热点微关注 发布于2015年4月29日 14:29 一.简单单词别拼写错误. 也先告诉大家先敲一个警钟!高考答题时,尽量别出现单词拼写错误,要是比较长的单词拼错了还好说,那种最简单的单词千万不要拼错!如果错了可能就不是 ...查看


热门内容